Senior Leaders from Banking in Energy and Telecom: Strategic Decision or Underestimated Risk?

In recent years, the discussion around talent has become noticeably more refined. We are no longer talking simply about “good people,” but about people who are right for the context. And one of the questions that keeps coming up in conversations with boards and HR directors is this: “Is it, or is it not, a good idea to recruit senior leaders from banking into industries such as energy or telecom?”

 

The honest answer is: it depends.

And this “it depends” deserves a careful analysis, without bias (my own 25 years of experience come from banking), but also without prejudice.

 

Why this question is emerging now

 

Energy and telecom are currently going through a phase very similar to what banking experienced 10–15 years ago:

 

• increasingly strict regulation,
• growing pressure on governance and compliance,
• major investments with systemic impact,
• high requirements for reporting, control, and transparency.

 

McKinsey & Company analyses consistently show that industries undergoing accelerated transformation tend to look for leaders who have already navigated cycles of complexity, regulatory pressure, and reputational risk, even if they do not come from the industry “core.”

 

At the same time, Antal International reports point to a clear increase in interest for cross-industry senior profiles, where strategic thinking and the ability to manage complex systems matter more than narrow technical expertise.

 

The PRO arguments: why senior leaders from banking can be a solid choice

 

1. Experience in highly regulated environments

Banking is one of the most tightly controlled professional environments. Senior professionals in risk, compliance, audit, or finance are accustomed to operating under constant pressure, documenting decisions, and adhering to strict frameworks. For industries where regulation is rapidly intensifying, this experience is extremely relevant.

 

2. A culture of accountability and informed decision-making

In banking, mistakes have real consequences. This reality shapes leaders who understand the long-term impact of decisions and manage complex risks with caution and clarity. McKinsey highlights that leaders shaped in low-error-tolerance environments perform better in volatile contexts.

 

3. Systemic, not functional, thinking

Senior banking professionals are used to seeing the organization as a whole: business, risk, legal, IT, operations. This approach becomes critical in energy and telecom, where decisions are interdependent and rarely isolated.

 

4. Operational discipline and governance

Processes, reporting, and internal control are second nature, not additional effort. In organizations undergoing expansion or transformation, this discipline can bring stability and predictability.

 

The CON arguments: where real risks appear

 

1. The industry learning curve

A professional from banking does not initially know the technical specifics of energy or telecom. Without solid onboarding and clearly defined expectations, impact may be delayed and frustration can arise on both sides.

 

2. Cultural differences

The highly structured and cautious style typical of banking can clash with more agile or entrepreneurial organizations. Without adaptation, this style may be perceived as rigid.

 

3. The risk of professional comfort zones

Not all senior banking professionals manage to step out of a very well-defined framework. Ambiguity, a different pace, or the absence of mature processes can be difficult to handle.

 

4. Internal resistance

Leaders coming “from outside” may face skepticism. Without clear support from top management and well-managed communication, integration can become challenging.

 

What studies say about cross-industry transitions

 

McKinsey studies on leadership transitions show that leaders who change industries have comparable chances of success to those promoted internally, provided they are selected for transferable competencies rather than titles or past reputation.

 

Failures typically occur when:

 

• expectations are misaligned,
• the role is vaguely defined,
• onboarding is treated superficially.
•  

Antal International also points out that successful cross-industry mandates are those in which organizations explicitly seek experience in regulated environments and leadership capability, rather than “pure technical experts.”

 

The honest conclusion

 

Recruiting a senior leader from banking into energy or telecom is not a universal solution, but it can be a very strong strategic decision if done consciously.

 

Not every senior banking professional is suitable. But the right ones can bring exactly the mix of rigor, maturity, and systemic thinking that these industries need right now.

 

The right question is not: “Do they come from the industry?”
But: “Have they worked in complexity, regulation, and real pressure?”

 

Often, the answer lies exactly where we have not looked carefully enough.

 

If you are a senior leader considering a cross-industry transition, or if you represent an organization in energy, telecom, or financial services evaluating such profiles, this decision deserves to be approached in a structured way, not intuitively.

 

I regularly work with leaders who are exactly at this point of reflection. We can continue the conversation, in a practical way, tailored to your specific context.

 

[email protected]
+40 721 264 477